ford4ever Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Apologies if any topic like this previously but couldn't find it. Noticed a case mx110 this morning and it looks like it should be more than 110 hp given its size. Any other tractors out there that are less hp than they look or more hp than they look Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FNHIR Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Ford 5700, something like 68hp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nashmach Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Fiat 110-90 I bet that MX was turned up to about 140hp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 down this way the local dealership for case was selling the mx 110 with a bigger fuel pump from the mx170 as it was cheaper way of doing it. they sold loads of mx110's .even people that had only bought JD and fords and mf's were buying them. too much of a good deal. it is funny to watch a mx110 on a big baler and a mtx 150 on a wrapper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ploughmaster Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 The Massey Ferguson 2620 must be a candidate here - quite a big beast, but only 95 DIN hp. Which also brings to mind the MF 1200 which, although quite a powerful machine in its time was (in spite of its 'Big Artic' appearance) just 105 DIN hp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford4ever Posted August 11, 2009 Author Share Posted August 11, 2009 Ford 8210 4wd always looked more than 110 hp.(to me anyway) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 i saw on farmphoto a while back, a jd 6320 that puts out 150 hp on a straw chopper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
them3kid Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 the new massey ferguson range? not sure of model numbers but at a local massey dealers open night looked around a few and i thought they were oversized for their hp. the one i looked at would be the equivlent of a mf 4255. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coxy Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 most john deeres Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 now i think about, its only 10hp but i always thought the mf 5445 was 100 horse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 now i think about, its only 10hp but i always thought the mf 5445 was 100 horse the 5445 Tier II is 90hp... but the Tier III model is 100hp with an additional 10hp transport boost in 3rd and 4th gears The 5445 I had (tier II) is a good candidate here for a tractor that looks to big for its hp. Mr Ploughmaster has hit the other two Masseys on the head... spot on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tractor Twitcher Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 Ford 8210 4wd always looked more than 110 hp.(to me anyway) Fully concur, as a kid always thought they were much more powerful than that. Slightly alarmed to find out they had less than 150hp, same goes for the 7910. The Massey Ferguson 2620 must be a candidate here - quite a big beast, but only 95 DIN hp. Definitely another machine that makes quite an impression for so few horses. Others that seem to stick in my mind: Dutra D4K John Deere 7600 Same Laser 110 Deutz Fahr Agrostar 6.81 always thought this machine derserved to be a 240hp+ machine. Some of the big American machines Minneapolis Moline GV1, G705 and similar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 the 5445 Tier II is 90hp... but the Tier III model is 100hp with an additional 10hp transport boost in 3rd and 4th gears The 5445 I had (tier II) is a good candidate here for a tractor that looks to big for its hp. Mr Ploughmaster has hit the other two Masseys on the head... spot on... ill take your word for it marky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Light Land Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 8000 series Deere's with the lower numbers look like monsters but have buggar all under the hood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nashmach Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 Deutz 6.81 - now there is a rare beast David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tractor Twitcher Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 Deutz 6.81 - now there is a rare beast David Rare beast indeed Colm, never seen one in the flesh before but I do have a sales brochure on the 6.71 and 6.81 tractors that push out 165hp and 190hp respectively, also remember reading a "One Year On" article in Farmers Weekly on the 6.81 many years ago, impressive looking tractor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJB1 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 the david brown 1690 /case 1594-1694 case-ih 1594-1694 1594 95hp approx 1694 98hp approx even DB have said themselves the engine could be powered up to 140hp+ but would be in direct compitition with the american case 2090/2094 - 2290-2294 built tractors shame as iv'e driven a few of these uprated 15 -1694 tractors & feel like they should have been powered like this from the start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archbarch Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 4 cyl mb tracs look too big for their hp, also the jd 4055 Valtra n series tractors look small for their hp unless they have larger wheels fitted, i guess tyre size is a major factor in a tractors appearance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tractorman810 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 tyre size is all that really points to output now with the trend towards one body pannel/cab fits the full range the company makes, ok it saves money, but they all look oversized till you get to the biggies of the range guess the fords and mfs listed were early victims of the one part fits policy in the drive to save money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Light Land Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Well said Sean,your on the money mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford4ever Posted August 12, 2009 Author Share Posted August 12, 2009 tyre size is all that really points to output now with the trend towards one body pannel/cab fits the full range the company makes, ok it saves money, but they all look oversized till you get to the biggies of the range guess the fords and mfs listed were early victims of the one part fits policy in the drive to save money now that you say it mf 390 .2wd looks about 60hp while the 4wd version looks the 90hp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJB1 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 4 cyl mb tracs look too big for their hp, also the jd 4055 Valtra n series tractors look small for their hp unless they have larger wheels fitted, i guess tyre size is a major factor in a tractors appearance. i spose i have to agree with you there mate the smaller 50 models up to the 2850 somehow looked too small to have the horse power they were rated at but they pulled well , but as for the 4055 i think that was a great tractor, big & purposefull, when i drove one it was the biggest tractor in the area not just horse power ! milton mills dealers had to let the tyres down to get it into their workshops :D & the 18 speed powershift was so easy to use ,matter of fact there wasnt much it wouldn't pull , but you tell it's age was against it when the jd 64 was bought in as a replacement the plough lost a furrow , but other machines stayed the same , the 64 did it all , took a bit longer to do but it did it . i'll have that fiver now please jez :D :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATTY 7530 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 All MX i no off are 110hp. Does anyone think that the john deere 7530 is a bit small for a 200hp tractor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 All MX i no off are 110hp. Does anyone think that the john deere 7530 is a bit small for a 200hp tractor? yeah now you say that but the 74/7530 are built on a modifed 6930 chassis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allis8550 Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 Local contracter turning up at a job on a neighbours farm last week, with a bale wrapper behind a 160hp NH T6080, now that's what I call "punching above your weight"! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.