Jump to content

allis8550

Members
  • Posts

    928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by allis8550

  1.   Brilliant modellling work there John, really looks the part, but I would have said thats a MF 35 loader , not a 40. The underframe on the tractor is different on a 40, as it sweeps upwards and the sideposts are shorter with two different positions for the loader rams, have a look at these photos from the MF 35 and 40 brochures.

    post-611-132639014692_thumb.jpg

    post-611-132639014717_thumb.jpg

  2.  I have ten of these remarkable little books with dates ranging from 1964/65 up to Dec 1983, and what a mine of information they are.

            If you a fortunate enough to have the price lists that came with them, then some of the facts are staggering. For example in July 1971 a MF 135 would have cost you £1314 or £1400 with Multi-Power, a MF 40 loader to fit it would have been £148.50. A 90hp MF1080 was priced at £3091 in standard spec and a MF625 combine with 16ft table would have set you back £5700.

             However by June 1982 prices were climbing, a 88hp MF698 2wd would now cost you £13,800, a 115hp MF1250 artic was £21,800 and a 320hp MF4880 was a wopping £61,420. A 625 Super II combine with 16ft cut was now £28,721.

             I believe Rory is correct that these books were discontinued in the mid eighties ,as I haven't seen any later ones, however I do have a very similar MF product guide [ without the detailed specs ] , that I picked up at a show a couple of years ago.

    post-611-132639005469_thumb.jpg

  3.   Love them myself, one of the most versatile bit's of kit you can get, a tractor with a loader on. You can find just about any job you can do for it and still go out and do fieldwork, can't do that with a handler, not that i've got anything against handlers, and as someones already pointed out, with a modern loader you can pick it up or drop it off in 5 minutes anyway.

    post-611-132639004894_thumb.jpg

  4. You are indeed, correct, the Steiger Cougar KR 1280 and the Case IH 9150 are vitually identical tractors, both being fitted with the same Cummins LTA-10 6 cylinder diesel engine ,producing 280hp. The Steiger was also availible with the option of a CAT 3306 DITA ,280hp 6 cylinder, but this engine was not fitted to the 9150.  As for converting the model , basically all you do need to do is paint it green.

  5. I think I'd be very tempted to restore both, obviously no 1 is going to need a lot more work and effort , but in the long run both tractors are going to be quite valuble when put into good condition. You've only got to see what a decent 135 makes these days, to realise the better looked after they are the better for you.

  6. I think he should buy a new manitou teleporter then sell it to me like some other fool did last time (townies have too much money when they buy machines then sell them at 2 yrs old with no hours on them and only lifted a few little square bales)

    but to pull a mower he doesnt want anything bigger than a massey 35, get a 4 cylinder one i think its the same engine as the 240?? or rather we took the engine out of a 240 and stuck it in the 35 and it fitted, but anyway they run better.

    or get alittle old ford dexta or similar they are good (as much as i hate blue) anything bigger and his wasting his money for 6 acres, try to suggest a claas cougar!!! ;D ;D

                    Whatever you do, don't get a 4 cylinder 35, the're absolute b*&^***%s to get started. The 4 cylinder Standard engines were renowned for poor starting, so buy a 3 Cylinder 35!

  7. Nice buys there, Are you going to put a loader on the visio roof model, or better still put loader brackets on both ,then you,ve got the option of which tractor to use a loader on. Marky's right about the low profile cab being rare in UK, I don't think it even appears in a UK brochure.

  8. I would say , go round a few dealers, have a look at what's on offer, must be some good deals about at the moment. Ask if you can try it out on the farm, and above all don't listen to any advice you get on here, because its worth exactly what you paid for it.

  9. I used to have a 1967 MF135 multi-power, that would do 21.5 mph on the flat. That was until the engine seized and I replaced it with a recon, the pump on the new engine seemed not to have been limited the same as the original, as it would rev right round to the zero stop and the tractor would do over 25 mph on the flat. I was to afraid to open it right out ,other than in short bursts, as I had visions of pistons flying out all over the place.

                  On the 20mph speed limit on tractors, I believe this only applies if the tractor is towing a trailer.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.