rabh7840 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 ive heaps more pics but the cows need milkin now i buckraked on that wee jcb this summer for a day its a lethal machine on the big clamp got about 130hp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 i know it aint important but this isnt porters its R Killen & Sons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tractorman810 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 nice pics, what makes the green loader in that pics?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 nice pics, what makes the green loader in that pics?? leibherr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tractorman810 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 cheers mate not a comon brand round this way, infact i saw my first redrock loader the other day, and they have been out years now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 i know it aint important but this isnt porters its R Killen & Sons sorry was going fast did not realise sorry cj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 dont be aint that important only know because they lift ours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KIWINZ Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 its small scale but we have a forager jf stoll tralied forager pulled by the jd 6920's - dad carting 1 tralier with gready sides pulled by the nh tl100a - me the other tralier with gready sides pulled by the massey 390 - boss the pit jd 6410 with our 10ft twose buckrake - the nabier - the only guy in the hood that is half good on the pit apart from ma dad but because hees on thr forager he dosent do the pit but if he does he has the jd 6920's on the pit and we get a bigger tractor for the forager but we havnt done that for years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 cheers mate not a comon brand round this way, infact i saw my first redrock loader the other day, and they have been out years now its the ag spec version of the 538 probably Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 the kit of a contarctor from north shropshire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 sorry some of them arent good quality \ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 some size the pit machine is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 last 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 some size the pit machine is the year before these were taken they had a jd 7920 on the pit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerepower Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 not realy into the silage side of farming but great pictures that's been posted, it's nice to the different set ups people use Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 he's got front linkage why not use it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerstarâ„¢ Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 My thoughts too Murray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deerepower Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I would think you could hold more weight on the rear linkage and it would put less pressure on the rear compaired to the front of the tractor \ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerstarâ„¢ Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Then you would put weights on the back, like we do at work. The chassis on that MF is strong as you like, a buckrake full of grass isn't hardly stressful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 Then you would put weights on the back, like we do at work. The chassis on that MF is strong as you like, a buckrake full of grass isn't hardly stressful. thats how our contractor does it buckrake on the front and a weight on the back no danger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 im not sure why they dont use the front linkage i think the lad that does the raking prefers it that way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 i think i would rather have it on the front rather than getting a stiff neck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffithsbros Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 a few more of my pics this time its a contractor called david latham sorry again for the bad quality of some of the photos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.