Jump to content

An interesting topic... about machinary choice.. open to all to reply


Lord Ferguson

Recommended Posts

Now then... I've just looked at a brochure that Pudding posted for a 'space age rendering' of a combine harvester... and for me it posed a very big question..

What factors do you allow to be part of your decision making process when purchasing new equipment... (for example... does looks play a part ???)

I am particularly interested in the 'REAL FARMERS' answers on here... but it's open to all.. so please DO have a pop at it... and think carefully before you answer

So the question is... you have to buy a tractor... and it has to be new... so score these 'decision makers' OUT OF 20 for each category... to kick us off... here is mine...

Brand/manufacturer - 20/20 (sad... but true)

Price 10/20 (so long as it was 'in the ball park' with other brands I was happy to have an MF)

Perceived reliability 0/20 (because for me it just had to be a red one !)

Looks 15/20

Now I know that is by no means all the factors in a farmers decision making process to buy new equipment... but it's just for fun anyway...

Go on... you have a go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm good topic Marky, as not a farmer here this is what i'd base my decision upon..

Brand/Manafacturer - 7/20

Country of origin - 15/20

Interior design - 13/20

Looks - 20/20

Price - 10/20

Reliability - 15/20

How it makes me feel when i look at it - 20/20

Im not sure how to explain it really, i am big fan of looks, which ties into how it makes me feel really. I'd also like it to be quite comfy or efficient inside. For me the brand and manafacturer doesn't really have much of a play to my decision. I also would obviosuly consider price and reliability, as i'd want to pay the minimum for something which will be reliable for ages. Im not sure im quite drawn to an old Renault or Fendt  :-\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Nick... an interesting answer as well mate  ;)

So you are not really a 'brand man' - more of a 'looks man' then  :-\

Im not so much a brand man to be honest, i used to be John Deere 'orientated' but i have diversified significantly, i just have my personal taste which is based upon how the tractor looks, how i'd feel inside it e.g. working and how it makes me feel to look at it. And strangely im finding myself drawn to Renaults, Fendts etc preferably smaller and older?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brand/Manafacturer - 15/20

Looks - 18/20

Price - 10/20

Reliability - 15/20

now if i was buying a new tractor one of the most important thing for me is to have a decent size set of tyres that fill the arch the width would be dictaed buy its dutys, i hate small diameter tyres/wheels. then i suppose the style of the tractor would have a bit of influence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Primarily it had to be blue so initially that was a full 20.

After trying the 4cyl T6040 I resigned myself to a 10/20 for brand on the basis that the NH was kack - obviously that changed after trying the 6 cyl T6030.

Reliability wasn't a massive deciding factor as the mainline machine won't do many hours in reality and we keep them for duration of warranty.

Price was a high scorer but it's more of a yes or no. Big money machines like a Fendt didn't get a look in as we don't do the hours to warrant it.

Bizzarely engine note was more inportant than any of those, after the 4 pot demo there was no way either the old man or I could have loved anything other than a 6!

Looks were a high scorer but it's very subjective.... anything that's blue looks OK to me, but I think most modern machines look smart, it's not the same emotional choice as with a car but as Chris says, a decent set of boots makes a big difference.

It comes down to being fit for duty though more than pulling the women!

Don't forget fuel economy. I see that New Holland and SDF are pushing this aspect quite strongly in their advertising at the moment.

Doesn't feel like strong point!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is already starting to become interesting... Chris's post surprised me a little... with our first 'TRUE USER' opting for looks as a key decision maker...

Interesting comment on tyres too... and an angle I can understand as well... My 5445's tyres look a bit small to me (and don't fill the arches) and it does 'spoil the look' somewhat...

Once again though... I thought tyres we 'matched to the job' and not bought for their looks  :-\

Simon's post was more what I expected I think.. although engine note was a bit of a surprise too

thanks for the replies lads... keep em coming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brand/Manafacturer - 10/20              ok I`d have preferred an MF .BUT.............

Country of origin - 10/20              they are  mostly all imported now anyway

Interior design - 12/20          as long as the ergonomics are good for me then not too fussed about justin and colin type interiors

Looks - 10/20        less important as long as the machine works !!!

Price - 10/20    to me thats less important if the machine is fully fit for purpose, has all the toys I need  rather than just want  BUT times change and everything has to be considered

Reliability - 20/20  top for me  I want a machine that works ! one  I can rely on to do the job when I want it done and for as long as I want it done.

Resale value - 15/10 important if you`re regularily changing kit

Ok so  we chose a Claas last time because of past experience with the Renaults we used to hire ........the paymaster general (dad) liked them and was able to operate them ok some he finds too confusing now. secondly because of the price, we got offered a deal  we couldn`t refuse..........we replaced a well worn  MF 390 with the 102 HP  Celtis 456 RX, with loader, bought new bucket and grab for the Claas (chillton) ..for the same price we paid for the 390 back in `94.

lots to consider  in  today`s market conditions  rather than purely price  and looks eh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ha ha!..........this is a interesting read

its a harsh reality that a lot of mainstream operators only require tractors to last to the end of warranty.......so why build something that will last longer.......

would you own a red landini marky?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always a second hand people Dad and I are so a bit more to consider:

Model: How will it fit our current system and also what machinery we intend to buy

Make: Tied to reliability really

Reliability:

Local dealer and also who is selling it - original dealer important too

Number of hours

Dairy/arable farm

Do we know the previous owner?

What previous runners of the type of machines thought of them?

Cab? Is it low enough for some buildings and how comfortable is it

Looking more and more at tyres they are on

Biggest is price ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different Marky  ;)

Will it do the job?  20/20

Reliability    20/20

Dealer Backup    15/20

Gizmos  :D    15/20

Economy/Servicing    15/20

Comfort/ergonomics    15/20

Brand (past experience?)      12/20

Looks      12/20

Fit existing kit/wheels/buildings(!)  12/20

Country of Origin  10/20

Price (VFM)      10/20

Future use    10/20

Trade in value  10/20

I look for a reliable machine that will do all I require. Price within reason is not a crucial factor. As I drive it myself, comfort and ease of use is important. Tyres are specced. to suit you on whatever machine you buy.

Looks not so important but lots of guys round here who buy a tractor for an employee to sit on find that if he doesn't like the looks of it, it won't ever 'go properly'. Trade in depends on timing - I got a great price for the 8360 as it was in demand - if export is flat, price drops. Some makers claim good resale value, but if you're paying £8k - £10k more for same spec tractor, you would hope so!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting John... and more like what I expected... er.... I think  :-[:D :D

So... looks get 12/20 then  :-\

and country of origin.... now that's an interesting one as well... I won't put you on the spot by asking which countries of manufacture you DONT favour... but how about the question reversed.... Which country of Manufacture would you most favour ??? and why ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A wee story on the subject from ol....

A few years ago I did 2 seasons with on a dutch owned farm that were growing flower bulbs.Every winter the farm manager would call round the local tractor dealers and hire what ever tractors he could get.Most often they were around 100hp give or take.

Being a pen pusher that seldom came out to the paddock he would hire the cheapest tractors he could.

Working at speeds as low as 0.4kph in the paddock and then doing 40kph on the road was not easy for some tractors,for a time we were runing a Case 5130 and Case MX110 both of witch simply couldn't go slow enough when the harvestor was crawlling along so the trailer driver would put the tractor into neutral for a second them take off again once the arm of the digger got close to the front of the trailer.Needless to say it wasn't long before the 5130's clutch packed up and the arm on the digger was bent and battered it was only then when the digger stopped for repairs did the manager wake up to what we had been saying would happen.

Next season we ran a NH TS115A and JD6410 both had no problem with the task at hand.

So for me one of main things I look/would look for is a tractor that I know will be able to go slow enough for specialist jobs that will come up eg:might need a creeper box put in or get tractor with a CVX type box if funds permit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brand/Manafacturer - 10/20 always be a massey lad , but i'd have to buy whats right for the job

Country of origin - 15/20 all forieign anyway

Interior design - 20/20 if you have to spend 12 + hours a day in it then it's got to be right

Looks - 15/20 they're all starting to look the same nowadays

Price - 15/20 would be prepared to pay that little bit extra if it was worth it

Reliability -17.5/20 major factor in down time costs

most importantly

dealer / manufacturer backup & support 20/20 no good having the best machine in the world ,if the backup & support isn't forthcoming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A wee story on the subject from ol....

A few years ago I did 2 seasons with on a dutch owned farm that were growing flower bulbs.Every winter the farm manager would call round the local tractor dealers and hire what ever tractors he could get.Most often they were around 100hp give or take.

Being a pen pusher that seldom came out to the paddock he would hire the cheapest tractors he could.

Working at speeds as low as 0.4kph in the paddock and then doing 40kph on the road was not easy for some tractors,for a time we were runing a Case 5130 and Case MX110 both of witch simply couldn't go slow enough when the harvestor was crawlling along so the trailer driver would put the tractor into neutral for a second them take off again once the arm of the digger got close to the front of the trailer.Needless to say it wasn't long before the 5130's clutch packed up and the arm on the digger was bent and battered it was only then when the digger stopped for repairs did the manager wake up to what we had been saying would happen.

Next season we ran a NH TS115A and JD6410 both had no problem with the task at hand.

So for me one of main things I look/would look for is a tractor that I know will be able to go slow enough for specialist jobs that will come up eg:might need a creeper box put in or get tractor with a CVX type box if funds permit.

That's a good example of having gear that suits your needs as well as affordability/avaialbity. Some people have to have it right in front of them before they'll accept that fact.

Brand 12/20 I'd prefer an MF but i'm not ONLY an MF fan.

Size 15/20 No one wants a tractor thats under powered either. All you get then is more wear and tear on the gear, more gas and less productivity!

Configuration 18/20 What you're using it for and where matters too - tracked, wheeled, rigid or articulated.

Price 10/20 The cost to buy would depend on what I wanted it for and how much I had to spend!

Reliability 18/20would be paramount unless I had another tractor on standby.

Cab 20/20 The setup has to suit you if you're stuck in it for long periods. That doesn't mean it has to be new though. some old cabs are really comfy and fun to use

Style 15/20 There's something to be said about driving something with a bit of character

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.