marshman Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 You didnt list it on ebay untill later that night, just trying to wast our time looking for it :D :D * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Sorry Barry i must of still been hungover from the night before and i've regretted it ever since ;) :'( : As for you lord i'll swap it for that new IFOR willaims you've got sat in the yard ;) I've never even seen my Ifor Williams... I wonder if it really exists :D - I reckon they took my money and ran off with it NOTE TO SELF - Check that in the new year ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nashmach Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 Maybe the pikeys took it - I hear they quite like IW trailers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted December 30, 2008 Share Posted December 30, 2008 That's why I've never taken delivery of it... it's tucked away in my local MF dealers shed... I think they may be getting fed up with it now mind you :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massey Boy Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 looks very very nice Simon looks better than it did in the first picture you showed us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 Hi time lord someone just told me its a 702 would that be right \ \ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massey Boy Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 This is a 203 thought these might help Simon said the bloke who said it was 702 because it has a four cylinders so dose this help or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparrow legs Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 re first pics, the brackets look the same as i had on my tef20, it was a mil loader sold the loader as it was a bu@er to clim on and off with them fitted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 Hi time lord someone just told me its a 702 would that be right \ \ The tractor is a 203 Si... the loader SHOULD have been a 702 mate... that's the loader fitted in the pic Cerin posted above... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massey Boy Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 but i asked the man who ownes the 203 above and he said his one has 3 cylinder engine so whould that make a diffrence to Simons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 but i asked the man who ownes the 203 above and he said his one has 3 cylinder engine so whould that make a diffrence to Simons The early ones had the 4 cylinder Cerin.. still a 203 though mate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted January 4, 2009 Author Share Posted January 4, 2009 So these idoits that keep telling me on ebay its a 702 can go jump then ;D :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 So these idoits that keep telling me on ebay its a 702 can go jump then ;D :D Indeed... 702 was the loader.. it was a little confusing mind you... as they sold the 702 'with 4 different powerplants' - does make it sound like the model is a 702 I guess \ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted January 4, 2009 Author Share Posted January 4, 2009 I'll be giving the heap away the way its going :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Udimore Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 I'll be giving the heap away the way its going :D :D BONFIRE BONFIRE BONFIRE :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 Ah... hang on... just read John Farnworths book.. he says the early 4 cylinder 35 was simply called a 702 Si... so it looks like I could be wrong.. he says the 203 only came after the launch of the 3 cylinder engine... Addition... It looks like they called the 702 just the loader after this point (61) \ I'll do some more digging I think (no pun intended) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted January 4, 2009 Author Share Posted January 4, 2009 It might well come to that once i've insured it ;) :D Ah... hang on... just read John Farnworths book.. he says the early 4 cylinder 35 was simply called a 702 Si... so it looks like I could be wrong.. he says the 203 only came after the launch of the 3 cylinder engine... I'll do some more digging I think (no pun intended) Ha ha so you were wrong then :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted January 4, 2009 Share Posted January 4, 2009 It looks that way mate.... new one on me I have to say.... Another bloody brochure I have to collect now then :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted May 12, 2009 Author Share Posted May 12, 2009 I hate this tractor even more now its just cost me £550 to have the clutch done as they had to rebuild it cause we couldn't get the right one or some rubbish typical Massey heap > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ferguson Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 I hate this tractor even more now its just cost me £550 to have the clutch done as they had to rebuild it cause we couldn't get the right one or some rubbish typical Massey heap > > No... that's bad new Simon... what';s different about the clutch then... I assume it's got no PTO this tractor EDIT... Just looked at the pics.. it has got a PTO.. I'd say it should be a standard 35 clutch pack then.. if 10+ (MF) can't help then I am sure vapourmatic do the bits for them Si Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tractorman810 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 was wondering the same marky, cant see it being any different to a 35 or 65 ,unless its a heavy duty version Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted May 18, 2009 Author Share Posted May 18, 2009 Yeah its a heavy duty or something they couldn't find a replacement so had to rebuild it its going in a local farm sale on friday so fingers crossed \ \ \ ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMON. Posted May 21, 2009 Author Share Posted May 21, 2009 Been out doing a spot of tanking this evening :D :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.